REPOSITORI INSTITUSI
UNIVERSITAS BHAYANGKARA SURABAYA
 
PENELUSURAN INFORMASI

Masukkan kata pencarian pada kotak diatas
 

UBHARASURYA » PhD Theses » Fakultas Hukum
di-posting oleh rrnina09@yahoo.co.id pada 2015-04-06 12:11:38  •  634 klik          Permohonan Koleksi

PEMBALIKAN BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM RANGKA PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA

disusun oleh Sumaryanto, A. Djoko (Dr.; S.H., M.H) - NIM:090515704/D

SubyekPIDANA KORUPSI
Kata Kunci Pidana KorupsiPembuktian Pidana
KontributorProf. Dr. Nyoman Serikat PJ, S.H., M.H -- NIP.130529438
Tanggal tercipta2008-09-25
Jenis(Tipe)PhD
Bentuk(Format)pdf
BahasaLainnya
Pengenal(Identifier)UBHARASURYA-PhD-090515704D2008
No Koleksi090515704D2008
No Klasifikasi345.025 Sum p


Sumber :
Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Pasca Sarjana Universitas Airlangga Surabaya

Relasi/Tautan:
Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Pasca Sarjana Universitas Airlangga Surabaya

Ketentuan (Rights) :
Disertasi A Djoko Sumaryanto -090515704/D Untuk Gelar Doktor Dalam Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Program Pasca Sarjana UNAIR


[ ANOTASI / ABSTRAK ]



[ DESKRIPSI LAIN ]

Reversal burden of proof of corruption act is a penal instrument to disclose corruption act and measure the loss disadvantaging national development and public welfare as a whole. According from above some problems to be analyzed in the disertation as follows; What is The concepts Loss of public Finance in the perspective of Penal Law?, Is Reversal burden of proff in Corruption law be likely in the future? The Study is carried out by using out by using normative legal research, comprising of law approach, case approach, and concepts approach, with following results: Deep review reveals that to the present the reversal burden of proof only exists in legelation (Article of 37 in Act No.31 of 1999 jo Act No.20 of 2001 with the right to profe that the doings are not corruption acts, and Article 37 Paragraph (1) in Act no.31 of 1999 jo Act no.20 0f 2001 with compulsion for defendants to prove that his/her wealth was earned not from corruption act), being not optimally applied in some court sessions. While asset recovery is by exerting maximum senteces, embarcing main sentences (prison and fines) and additional sentences (reimbursement). From review to the problem above is it propused several things. That finance loss state is corruption law so Daad-dader Strafrecht concept becomes Daad-dader Slacttoffer Strafrecht because in corruption act there things which are connecting to each others, the are act, crime & victim (state), Both are purposed in arranging draft againts corruption in the future in making reversal burden of proff and state deserves for recovery loss in stage of investigator and can be adapted a system which combine between burden of proff with state deserves for recovery loss is" plea baraing syatem. Because plea bargaining systems has saveral advantages to againts corruption..

 Download File Penyerta (khusus anggota terdaftar)

...Tidak ada file penyerta...
 Download File Bebas Download

  1. UBHARASURYA-PhD-9-Balikcov.pdf
    5260 KB - application/pdf